Who says you cannot get published?
نویسنده
چکیده
O ne cannot go past the achievements of the winners of the Ig Nobel awards when it comes to service to medicine and science. The Igs are intended to celebrate unusual and imaginative research and are awarded annually by the science humour magazine Annals of Improbable Research. The aim is to make people think and laugh, and along the way it may spur people’s interest in science, medicine, and technology. The prizes are presented at a gala ceremony held at Harvard University and the awards are given to the winners by genuine Nobel Laureates. Although sports medicine is not yet a category in these awards one can take inspiration from past winners who are relentlessly pushing the envelope in our field. For example, Americans Edward Cussler and Brian Gettelfinger won for conducting a careful experiment to settle the longstanding scientific question: can people swim faster in syrup or in water? Or what about Ramesh Balasubramaniam and Michael Turvey for explaining the biomechanics of hulahooping. We also need to acknowledge Peter Barss of McGill University, for his seminal report in an often neglected area ‘‘Injuries Due to Falling Coconuts.’’ A winning paper with more of an orthopaedic flavour was by David Dunning of Cornell University and Justin Kreuger of the University of Illinois for their report, ‘‘Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.’’ Cognitive science is well represented with recent winners who have studied ‘‘The effects of unilateral forced nostril breathing on cognition’’ and ‘‘How chewing gum flavor affects measures of global complexity of multi-channel EEG’’ but one of the real highlights was the paper by Claire Rind and Peter Simmons of Newcastle University in the UK for electrically monitoring the activity of a brain cell in a locust while that locust was watching selected highlights from the movie ‘‘Star Wars.’’ Why? You may well ask. Some winning studies, however, are far more subtle in their meaning. Take for example, the statistical report ‘‘Estimation of the total surface area in Indian elephants’’ 8 or perhaps the work using basic principles of physics to calculate the pressure that builds up inside a defecating penguin, or even the discovery that herrings apparently communicate by farting. Myself, I prefer the more practical Australian study by a colleague of mine ‘‘An analysis of the forces required to drag sheep over various surfaces.’’ Tricky creatures, sheep. Clearly a low friction surface is required when dragging your sheep around the house. For those who feel that the rejection letters from editors mean their manuscript may never see the light of day, hope springs eternal.
منابع مشابه
Believing, Holding True, and Accepting
You do not know who this Zhuangzi is, not even if it is the name of a man; you don’t know either what a shi or a cheng is. But on the basis of the author's authority, you believe that the sentence “Zhuangzi's principle is that you cannot get a shi without having a cheng” is true. You do not understand this sentence, for you do not know what it means, therefore you don't believe that Zhuangzi's ...
متن کاملBOOK REVIEW on A New Kind of Science by Stephen Wolfram Wolfram
“Somebody says, ‘You know, you people always say that space is continuous. How do you know when you get to a small enough dimension that there really are enough points in between, that it isn’t just a lot of dots separated by little distances?’ Or they say, ‘You know those quantum mechanical amplitudes you told me about, they’re so complicated and absurd, what makes you think those are right? M...
متن کاملBook Review: A New Kind of Science
“Somebody says, ‘You know, you people always say that space is continuous. How do you know when you get to a small enough dimension that there really are enough points in between, that it isn’t just a lot of dots separated by little distances?’ Or they say, ‘You know those quantum mechanical amplitudes you told me about, they’re so complicated and absurd, what makes you think those are right? M...
متن کاملEpistemology: Five Questions
Imagine n children playing together. The mother of these children has told them that if they get dirty there will be severe consequences. So, of course, each child wants to keep clean, but each would love to see the others get dirty. Now it happens during their play that some of the children, say k of them, get mud on their foreheads. Each can see the mud on others but not on his own forehead. ...
متن کامل'ought', 'can', and Practical Reasons 1
As intuitive as OIC might seem, we should acknowledge that the arguments offered in its support often do not warrant the sort of confidence many of us have in the principle. For example, friends of OIC often say that the principle is needed to explain certain linguistic behaviors. 3 Suppose Smith sees Jones sitting in a chair and Jones tells Smith that he has just been robbed. 'You ought to cal...
متن کاملWHO puts healthy ageing on the front burner.
“You old people get out and do something!” The advice comes from Felimina Rotundo, who runs a laundry shop in Buff alo, NY, USA. She turned a hundred on Oct 20, 2015, and has been “doing something”—working 11 hours a day, 6 days a week, from dawn to dusk—for the past 85 years. “I talk to people all day”, she tells the journalists gathered in the doorway of her shop. “I get up in the morning and...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- British journal of sports medicine
دوره 40 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006